I had a client a few years ago who died of a heart attack when he was 73 years old. He died while still "at the top of his game" (to borrow a phrase from baseball) as a distinguished college professor at Georgia Tech and an elder statesman in local politics in Fulton County, Georgia.
It says something about our times that his death seemed much too soon. A generation or two ago he would have been considered "elderly." The suddenness of it reminds us of how precarious life can be. Since I worry about such things as part of my work, it reminds me of how important it is that a person not only have a well-drafted will, but also an up-to-date estate plan. A will that is ten years old can still work very well from a legal perspective, but in those ten years a person's estate plan can become obsolete.
An estate plan matches a person's economic reality to the legal arrangements to dispose of their wealth in the event of death. It's designed to implement their wishes and minimize exposure to taxes. Whether a person uses a Last Will and Testament or a combination of a Will and a "living trust," organizing the title to property and the beneficiary designations is essential to a successful estate plan.
A while back I had a client, who is not married and has no children, tell me that he wanted a clause in his will setting aside a percentage of his assets to pay for some of the college costs of his niece and nephew. He controlled about $300,000 of assets, but most of it was in retirement accounts, which are not affected by his will. So his estate plan would need to coordinate his beneficiary designations and the bequests in his will so as to get the "correct" portion of that $300,000 into a college fund.
A person can title his or her property in several ways, all of which have implications for how ownership of it will pass in the event of death. It is common for a husband and wife to have their home and other real property titled jointly with right of survivorship. This approach emphasizes flexibility over predictability. It postpones the issue of the ultimate passage of title to a non-spouse beneficiary (such as the children of that marriage, or of multiple marriages) to the "second death," the death of the surviving spouse, whoever that might be.
Let's consider the hypothetical case of Mr. & Mrs. Hitech who both work in North Fulton County for telecommunications companies. They each have grown children from previous marriages who are all in their 20's, with some still in college. Each has life insurance policies totaling $600,000 and retirement accounts of about $500,000. With their other assets each would leave an estate worth over $2 million. However over half of that wealth is in retirement accounts or death benefits from life insurance.
After the tax reform bills passed in 2010 and 2017, the Federal Estate Tax has become a non-issue for over 99% of the population. The Hitech family should be safe from the IRS because (as of 2020) over $11 million can be passed to the children without any estate tax. That "exempt amount" may revert back in 2026 to a lower amount established in 2011. However, adjusted for inflation that is likely to be no less than $6 million. Thus, tax planning has become less important. For most people the selection of the primary and secondary beneficiaries on the retirement accounts and life insurance is equal in importance to what is done in the wills and/or trusts. Those designations could be pivotal in the transmittal of wealth to the surviving spouse and children in a fashion satisfactory to the client.
If the spouse is the sole beneficiary in our fictional Hitech family, there is a real possibility that the entire $4.0 million of family wealth will be controlled by the wishes of whoever happens to be surviving spouse. If there is a trust in the will of the first spouse to die it may get few, if any, assets because practically all of the decedent's assets never "passed under" the will (and thereafter to the trust). Why would that happen? The answer would be those beneficiary designations and the residential property owned “joint with right of survivorship.” Even in a case where there is no blended family, there is no guarantee that the surviving spouse will not re-marry and leave the entire family wealth from the first marriage to that second spouse.
It should be obvious by now that drafting a good set of documents is only part of the solution. A person needs to coordinate the economic reality with those legal documents and keep them coordinated in the years after their execution. Failure to do so may cause a lot of disappointment and heartache when the documents "work" but the estate plan doesn't.
This site is established for general information only. The discussion of legal issues should not be construed to constitute formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Persons accessing this site are encouraged to seek independent counsel for advice regarding their individual legal issues. Persons not residing in the State of Georgia should be aware that the law in other states may differ materially from some of the legal principles discussed here.